Stairway to heaven

Other than the friends I left behind in the UK, there are not that many things that I really miss about my life in London. That does, however, not mean that there are not a few areas where I have always felt the Dutch could stand to learn a lesson or two from their overseas neighbours. Escalator etiquette is one of those things. Anyone who has tried public transport commuting in the Netherlands and who has had to dash for that connecting train will know what I mean. We Dutch just like to stand all over the place, dead set on thwarting all those who try to survive in the fast lane. The simple concept of "walk left, stand right" is lost on us. Until now...

Yesterday morning I arrived at the station of my native Amersfoort. To my surprise I found the escalators there had been decorated with bright green and red footprints, teaching us silly Dutch how to behave on an escalator! Apparently it is part of a 'pilot project' and Amersfoort has been lucky enough to get the premiere. Believe it or not but it even came with a crash course in elevator walking. It seems we are just THAT stupid. Well, I hope it works. What's next? Allow me to make a suggestion: could we please send the Amsterdam taxi drivers to learn from their London black cab colleagues?

Good bye Lenin!

For the last week I have been in Russia once again. The whole trip had a significant déja-vu feel as essentially it involved the same people and places as it did last time. The Red Square and Kremlin are still impressive the second time around but at the risk of sounding a bit blasé: been there - done that. Even the weather greeted me like an old friend as the familiar rains poured down once more on Saturday. Fortunately I had allowed myself one extra day at the end of my stay and on Sunday the Indian Summer showed itself, even if it was shy. It gave me the opportunity for ticking off some of the boxes left on my what-to-see-when-in-Moscow list.

First up was the New Tretyakov gallery, the big brother to the other Tretyakov gallery I had visited last time. The New Tretyakov houses 20th century Russian art and in all fairness was far more to my liking than the icons and classic Russian paintings on display at its sibling. Particularly the avant garde paintings of artists such as Aristarkh Lentulov or Kazimir Malevich were in my opinion highly worth seeing. The collection of socialist art, full of propagandist glorification of peasants and labourers, was also quite interesting. Unfortunately about half of the museum was closed for renovations but since I had already been marvelling around for close to two hours by the time I reached those sections, I could not really be too disappointed.

Just outside the museum is another little gem: the Sculpture Park. Once apparently known as the "Park of Fallen Heroes", it is home to a collection of statues that in Soviet times adorned the city's squares and monuments. After the fall of communism the countless busts of Lenin, Stalin and the likes were relocated to this park where they now share the limelight with a more colourful collection of somewhat random sculptures. Especially powerful -particularly due to its juxtaposition to a life sized figure of Stalin- was an installation composed of dozens of sculpted faces packed behind barbed wire, thus remembering the victims of Stalin's labour camps.


After this trip my Moscow-to-do list has gotten another bit shorter. Of course there is always plenty left but frankly, I hope next time they'll send me to St. Petersburg instead!

All pictures

Raise the red lantern

When 2 of my favourite cities meet, THIS is what you get?! O dear... so much for me ranting about how Amsterdam is more than just the red light district.

Art in the glow of Amsterdam red lights
Gallery hopes 'canal of the whores' will connect with more traditional works

By: Charlotte Higgins
The Guardian, Wednesday September 17 2008

Never have its gracious enfilades and echoing halls witnessed anything like it: the National Gallery, repository of the nation's finest Old Masters, is to re-create a red-light district, complete with scantily clad prostitutes, sinister alleyways and shop windows filled with human wares. This walkthrough installation is Ed and Nancy Kienholz's work Hoerengracht - Dutch for "whores' canal" - which will take its place in the gallery next autumn.

The idea is to make connections with the Dutch 17th-century paintings in the gallery's collection, which, despite their appearance of gentility, are set in the brothels for which Amsterdam is famous. Paintings such as Jan Steen's Interior of an Inn, Schalcken's A Man Offering Gold and Coins to a Girl and De Hooch's Musical Party in a Courtyard will be hung near the entrance to the installation, which the Kienholzes created in the 1980s.

The New York Times has described the effect of Hoerengracht thus: "In excruciating detail, a woman washes herself at a grungy sink; another, more scantily clad, sits in a chair scanning a magazine amid the kitschy trappings of her cubicle ... Still another professional, in leopardskin pants, high boots and a sequiny top, stands poised in a doorway behind an iron grille, mouth open in a sexy pout, fingers holding a cigarette."

Asked whether the installation would carry a warning for families, Colin Wiggins, the National Gallery's head of education, said: "In the paintings of De Hooch there are dodgy things going on, but we don't put warnings outside our Dutch 17th-century rooms. "Our aim is to stop people in their tracks and make them think, 'Crikey, this is unprecedented for the National Gallery.' Would you warn your child against it? Well, it depends who you are. Sarah Palin would probably warn her children. But we have Soho just down the road where you can see young ladies in leopardskin miniskirts."

Read more
(Picture: 'Hoerengracht' (detail of street corner with photo montage and mannequin), 1984-88 by Ed and Nancy Kienholz)

Healthy world

I must admit I haven't used my constitutional right to vote in a while. I suppose you could say that I have been hiding my voter apathy behind the rather flimsy excuse of living abroad. On top of that, the Dutch political landscape is just so depressing these days with parties such as the ominously titled "Trots op Nederland" (Proud of the Netherlands) and "Partij voor de Vrijheid" (Party for Freedom) that I'd rather run for the hills than participate in this sham. Not the way to go, I know. I'll try to do better in future. You've got to practice what you preach after all, and I'm certainly no stranger to a bit of political preaching. One of my former flatmates once sighed in desperation "Are all you Dutch so political?!".

A lot of my preaching takes places in the international rather than the domestic arena, probably in part the result of my line of work these days. Like so many across the world, I have been keeping a very close eye on the US presidential elections. And like so many outside of the US, I have had no trouble picking my favourite. Of course, healthcare is a topic close to my heart in this election. The American healthcare system represents both some of the best and worst in the world. Top class medicine for some but unattainable for many. In international aid and development on health, the Americans have also imposed an at times rather controversial agenda. It is interesting to see where the candidates stand on these issues. If I hadn't made up my mind already, this article just published in The Lancet might have done it for me:

Obama vs McCain on global health
by: Nellie Bristol
The Lancet (2008), 372:9638, p.521-522

In the run-up to the presidential election, US health care continues to dominate the debate. But where do the candidates stand on global-health issues? Nellie Bristol reviews Obama and McCain's pledges in this area, including their views on HIV/AIDS and international development.

When asked by a reporter last year if he supported the spending of US tax dollars on contraceptives in Africa to slow the spread of HIV/AIDS, John McCain, the Republican US presidential hopeful, seemed unsure and confused. "I haven't thought about it before", he said. "Before I give you an answer, let me think about it a little bit because I never got a question about it before. I don't know if I would use taxpayer money for it."

The scene illustrates what global-health experts say is the key difference between McCain and Democratic contender Barack Obama in the area of global health: that of particular investment in the issue. "Obama has a personal knowledge and interest that is not insignificant", said J Stephen Morrison, executive director of the HIV/AIDS task force and of the Africa programme for the Center for Strategic & International Studies, based in Washington, DC. "He made sure he was smart around the issues of global health." Morrison cited Obama's Kenyan father and his August, 2006, visit to Africa where Obama and his wife Michelle were publicly tested for HIV/AIDS in an attempt to reduce stigma attached to the procedure. "I do not think McCain is indifferent, but I do not think he has the same level of personal knowledge or passion", Morrison said. "[McCain has] said much less both about development issues and global health so it's hard to infer from silence", said Ruth Levine, vice president for programmes and operations and senior fellow at the Center for Global Development (CGD). "It does not feel like a core part of the agenda he would bring in."

That difference is evident in the candidates' campaign literature and in their statements about global health. Although McCain is a vocal supporter of the US global AIDS programme—the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)—and has pledged to combat malaria in Africa, his campaign documents are thin on the subject of global health. Meanwhile, Obama's campaign promotes proposals to confront HIV/AIDS globally and has a multiple page list of sweeping reforms in international development. "He is really reading the play book of many of the strongest voices in development and in global health", Levine commented. Obama supports and calls for changes in PEPFAR, including an additional $1 billion over 5 years to fight the epidemic in southeast Asia, India, and eastern Europe. He also calls for increasing the capacity of health systems to deliver HIV/AIDS treatment. In a move likely to cost him support among pharmaceutical manufacturers, Obama also pledges to "break the stranglehold that a few big drug and insurance companies have" on HIV/AIDS drugs. "Obama supports the rights of sovereign nations to access quality-assured low-cost generic medication to meet their pressing public health needs", his campaign literature says.

Although supporting US bilateral HIV/AIDS efforts, Obama also advocates more US funding for multilateral programmes and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. US support for the Fund has been a partisan issue; some conservatives are concerned that the organisation does not reflect US policies on issues like sexual abstinence and needle exchange. Obama also pledges US support to meet the UN Millennium Development Goals. In 2005, he cosponsored the International Cooperation to Meet the Millennium Development Goals Act.
Some Americans view the UN suspiciously, and even hostilely, claiming its aim is to usurp US power and channel money to corrupt dictators. The USA is behind in its payments to the organisation and many, including Obama, are pushing for UN reforms. Nonetheless, development experts say his endorsement of the goals and of other multilateral efforts is substantial, indicating a change from the go-it alone strategy now used by the USA. "It is quite a profound departure from what we have seen up to this point", said Levine. "I think it will really bring US development policy into alignment with where Canada and the Europeans have been."

Another key piece of Obama's development platform is his Health Infrastructure 2020 plan. "Barack Obama will take the lead at the G8 working with and leveraging the engagement of the private sector and private philanthropy, to launch…a global effort to work with developing countries to invest in the full range of infrastructure needed to improve and protect both American and global health", campaign documents say. Among issues addressed by the plan is the migration of health-care workers from developing to rich countries. Obama also advances sweeping reforms for US foreign assistance—a move favoured by the development community and some members of Congress. He advocates doubling yearly foreign assistance to $50 billion by 2012 and endorses a $2 billion fund to support primary education globally. He also calls for 100% debt cancellation for the world's heavily indebted poor countries and programmes to advance commerce and democracy in struggling countries.

Add it all up and the dream plan of Obama's development experts costs a substantial amount of money, so much so that some question its feasibility. "It is not entirely clear to me that everyone has done their homework on how this could possibly be paid for in what is sure to be a real food fight around priorities in a tight economy", said CGD's Levine. In addition to fiscal constraints, because he is so engaged with the global development community in the USA, Obama is also likely to be buffeted by the tensions that exist within it, Morrison added. One major point of contention is the degree to which PEPFAR will become the whole of the USA's global-health policy for the foreseeable future. "What he [Obama] has is a very active and divided debate" with one side arguing that PEPFAR has had "hugely distorting impact on development commitment", he said. Those advocates will be "arguing for a rebalancing" against the constituency that believes PEPFAR can be tweaked sufficiently to serve a broader purpose. "I would anticipate that early in an Obama administration you are going to have some serious battles around these issues", Morrison commented.

Nils Daulaire, president of the Global Health Council, although a strong PEPFAR supporter, is among those who think that the USA should widen its focus. "The reality is that HIV/AIDS is a large, but by no means the predominate piece of the global-health puzzle", he said. The Global Health Council and others, he said, are "really focused on getting the next Presidential Administration and the next Congress to look at the larger issues of global-health infrastructure and basic health services and, in particular, bring back attention to the pretty severely neglected areas of maternal and child health and family planning."

Although global-health experts call for increased access to primary health care, specific diseases still tend to attract the most attention from candidates. On Malaria Awareness Day, McCain pledged as President to "end malaria in Africa". He said that the USA will spend $1 billion a year on the disease in the next few years and added, "I call upon the private sector to meet its obligation to serve a cause greater than its self-interest by matching the federal commitment dollar for dollar". Laurie Rubiner, executive director of the Malaria No More Policy Center, said eliminating deaths from malaria in Africa, would cost an estimated $2·2 billion a year over 5 years. The disease currently kills more children in Africa than AIDS and tuberculosis combined, she added. McCain's malaria pledge illustrates his commitment to "soft power" in US foreign policy, Rubiner commented. Another example of that approach is McCain's proposed "League of Democracies", which he refers to as "the core of an international order of peace based on freedom". In explaining the proposal, McCain said, "Our great power does not mean we can do whatever we want whenever we want, nor should we assume we have all the wisdom, knowledge, and resources necessary to succeed". He added: "We need to listen to the views and respect the collective will of our democratic allies."

Experts agree that both candidates support a more collaborative relationship with other countries, which could be a boon for global health generally. "Both Obama and McCain from quite different perspectives have an appreciation for the US in the broader context of the world", said Daulaire. "I think this is the most internationally savvy pair of candidates that we have ever had running for president."

Going Dutch

It's not been quite a week yet but steadily I am beginning to get settled back in into my Amsterdam life. So many things are still the same that at times it is as if I have never left. The shops I knew are all still there, I even recognise plenty of faces in the neighbourhood and much of Amsterdam is still in its by now familiar construction chaos. Still, there are a few things in my own habits and behaviour that are subtle reminders that I have been away for quite a while. I need to learn to look the other way again when crossing a street. I need to remember again to say my own name first when answering the phone. I need to go back again to using the magnetic strip on my bank card rather than the chip. I need to use a strippenkaart again, not an Oyster card. I need to start yelling at cyclists who nearly run me down again, instead of saying "Pardon me". I need to become that cyclist again, not the silly pedestrian. In short, I have to work on my 'inburgering'.

There is one change in the neighbourhood, however, that suddenly made me feel that perhaps I have taken a piece of the UK with me to Amsterdam. The squatted house around the corner suggests Banksy has gone Amsterdam too:

The eagle has landed

Here I am: back in Amsterdam! It has been a long couple of days. On Saturday I went to meet my mother in Dover to drive to London together. It actually took me leaving the UK to travel beyond the confines of the M25 [with slight exceptions for trips to Oxford and Cambridge]. Sunday was a particularly long day. My London apartment was situated on the third floor and unfortunately did not come with a lift so we had to carry all those boxes down those 60-something steps. With a fully loaded car we then spent about 9,5 hours on the road, travelling all the way back to the Netherlands. Three cheers for my brave mother for doing all this for me: hurrah, hurrah, hurrah!!

I was quite anxious to see my apartment again and to see how it had weathered out the storms of 2 years of tenancy. It turned out to be more Gustav than Katrina. There is no major damage of any kind, just the usual wear and tear that comes with habitation. Two years of alien occupation have, however, left their fair share of grease and grime everywhere. For the last two days we have been working on giving the place the deep clean it desperately needs, removing the mould from the fridge, busting the grime from the shower tiles and vacuuming up the smelly cigarette buds behind the bed. Slowly but steadily the place I know and love is starting to shimmer through again.

Not all my boxes are unpacked yet. In fact, not all boxes are retrieved from storage yet. Since I will be working from home for the next few months I intend to convert the guest room into a proper study (though guests will still be welcome and need not worry about having to sleep on the floor!). This means some serious reshuffling of furniture; moving the desk, shelves and bookcases around. As soon as that is done I will collect and unpack the rest of my stuff and will well and truly put my house in order. My only slight concern at this point? That I may have to do all this again in a few months time... sorry mum!